Once & Future Cities

          Share on Twitter

eBlog, 7/29/16

In this morning’s eBlog, we consider the critical, successful first effort by the City of Detroit to issue full faith and credit municipal debt–an effort complicated by the still unsettled fiscal situation of Detroit’s public school system; we examine the next chapter in the Chris Christie saga and Atlantic City’s efforts to avoid a default and /or state takeover. Finally, we consider the governance and leadership challenges that might threaten Detroit’s emergence and return to being the nation’s center of innovation.

Returning to the Municipal Market. As we wrote in anticipation yesterday, Detroit issued its first post-municipal bankruptcy debt in the wake of last month’s unanimous approval by the Detroit City Council of the issuance of up to $660 million of refunding bonds (a tax-exempt issuance projected by the city to save an estimated $37 million and help pave the Motor City’s return to the municipal bond market after emerging from the largest municipal bankruptcy in American history.) The sale encountered strong investor demand—and the successful sale will achieve budget savings that will facilitate the Motor City’s ability to provide budgetary and property tax relief—as well as resources to put aside $30 million from a budget surplus to deal with a possible public pension funding shortfall of nearly $500 million. The success marked, ergo, Detroit’s first post-bankruptcy general obligation/distributable state aid backed bond sale issue, with Detroit CFO John Naglick noting: “We experienced broad and deep investor participation and the savings certainly (significantly) exceeded our expectations.” While the fiscally recovering city paid a penalty on the $615 million issue over comparably rated municipal securities compared to other municipalities and states, the sale benefited from strong demand. CFO Naglick described the successful sale as a vote of confidence in Detroit’s efforts to turn around its finances since emerging from the nation’s largest-ever municipal bankruptcy a year and a half ago. Without a doubt, a key part of the success must be attributed to the indirect state backing of the bonds—or, as fabulous Matt Fabian of Municipal Market Analytics described it: “[The sale] shows that there is a fair bit of faith in the state of Michigan…A program like Michigan’s Distributable State Aid (DSA) is what distressed or crippled governments use to get market access…The city is still relying on the state, and, in no way, is Detroit back. If these bonds had been unenhanced bonds from the city, it would have been a different story.” He added that the successful sale appeared to indicate both a lack of apprehension on the part of investors that Detroit could be driven back into chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy, as well as investor understanding that the city’s full faith and credit is distinct from the severe fiscal challenges to the Detroit Public School system, or, as another analyst noted: “The city is not the school district, and the city has shown that at least in the first bankruptcy that this type of debt has been protected.”

Life Preserver. Claiming he was “tired of this,” New Jersey Governor Chris Christie yesterday approved a $74 million loan to Atlantic City—warning the city’s leaders to accept the loan—and its terms—or face municipal bankruptcy. The terms of the loan, however, are steep: under the state’s terms, if the municipality is unable to pay it back, the state would be authorized to seize critical municipal assets, including Atlantic City’s water utility and its former airport, break union contracts, and assume major decision-making powers from the city’s government for five years. The terms of the loan grants the city until November to come up with a five-year plan to address its fiscal insolvency. The formal announcement of the loan means Atlantic City can avoid default on Monday and make payments on an additional $18.6 million owed in municipal debt service for the rest of this year; the funds will also be critical in enabling Atlantic City to devise a five-year financial plan. As we wrote yesterday, Atlantic City Mayor Don Guardian and City Council President Marty Small have vowed Atlantic City will have a plan to close a $100 million shortfall in next year’s budget in time for the state-imposed Nov. 3rd deadline. If Atlantic City fails to submit a plan by Nov. 3rd, or if the plan is rejected, the state can sell city assets. Indeed, Mayor Guardian yesterday released a statement saying the city will make payroll today, as well as Monday’s debt payment: “We anticipate that the bridge loan agreement with the state will be completed in short order and the funding required by the act will be put in place to cover operational expenses of the city.”

A Challenge to Innovation & Leadership. I noted a truly extraordinary phenomenon yesterday to a class I was teaching to a visiting cohort from China at George Washington University on Innovation, where I spoke of the remarkable movement of the Silicon Valley, this country’s center of innovation for the last quarter century, to Detroit, because of the recognition of the immense changes ahead from the development of self-driving cars. But, unlike the Silicon Valley Partnership, where the high-tech industry, 22 cities and counties, and my old alma mater, Stanford, and San Jose State University devote themselves, annually, to acting (and issuing a report) on the steps most critical to making the region the most vital and compelling location in the globe for innovative CEO’s to locate, the exceptional opportunity for Detroit to become the nation’s center of innovation, once again, could now be jeopardized by the region’s seeming inability to demonstrate governance leadership. There appears to be a growing rift between counties in the region—a governance rift which has undercut plans to place a 20-year transportation millage before Metro Detroit voters in November. The Regional Transit Authority (RTA) board yesterday rejected, on a 5-4 vote, putting a 1.2-mil tax on the November ballot in the wake of opposition from officials from Macomb and Oakland Counties. Their apprehensions related to whether each county would get its fair share of funding if the millage were approved, and if future votes would protect the interest of each county or just a few. The adverse vote now leaves uncertain the fate of critical funding for regional rapid transit, as well as a commuter rail line from Ann Arbor to Detroit, airport shuttle service, a universal fare card system, and other improvements. Paul Hillegonds, Chairman of the RTA’s board, said after the vote: “This board has gone as far as it can go” on the issue and now elected officials have “to figure it out,” even as he questioned whether county leaders have the political will to make necessary decisions so that a millage is not delayed for two to four years.

RTA officials from Macomb and Oakland counties were unified against the millage proposal, but had joined the board in approving the rest of a $4.6 billion regional transit plan; however, under the governance structure statute, placing a measure on the ballot from the RTA requires seven of nine votes: one from each county. Yesterday’s vote, thus, fell two votes short, with both pairs of Macomb and Oakland representatives voting against. Had it been adopted, the 20-year millage would have cost the owner of a $200,000 home about $120 annually. Now the time for the region’s future is short: the region faces an August 16 deadline to have the ballot language certified by county clerks to appear on the November ballot.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s